Which criterion is not necessary for a burglary of an auto to warrant a response from a Crime Scene Analyst?

The criterion that is not necessary for a burglary of an auto to warrant a response from a Crime Scene Analyst is related to the timing of the request for investigation. When a crime occurs, especially in the case of an auto burglary, the urgency and recency of the incident can influence the collection of evidence. However, once a crime has been reported, it is still important for Crime Scene Analysts to respond, regardless of how much time has passed since the incident.

In many investigations, evidence can still be present and analyzable even after a 24-hour period. For instance, latent fingerprints, DNA evidence, and other physical evidence may still be recoverable, depending on environmental conditions and the materials involved. Therefore, a request made for analysis more than 24 hours after the incident does not eliminate the need for a response by a Crime Scene Analyst.

On the other hand, forced entry and identifiable property taken are crucial factors in determining the nature and severity of the crime, as they directly relate to the evidence of criminal activity. Additionally, having surfaces conducive to latent prints or DNA recovery is essential to gather physical evidence that can aid in the investigation, making those criteria relevant to the response of a Crime Scene Analyst.